Ted Belman at the American Thinker says that even if Donald Trump is guilty of all the things he is accused of, Ted Belman says he will still vote for him. Here are his reasons:
Donald Trump is against political correctness, globalization, open borders, unrestricted immigration, trashing the Constitution, crony capitalism, and corruption. Hillary Clinton, the opposite. She wallows in the last two.
Donald Trump wants to achieve “peace through strength” as President Reagan did. He wants to cancel the Iran deal, support our friends and allies, stop the growing hegemony of Iran, and defeat ISIS. Hillary Clinton, not so much.
Donald Trump names the enemy as “radical Islam” whereas Hillary Clinton refuses to do so. I, on the other hand, see Islam as the enemy. The adjective “radical” adds nothing. There is only one Islam, and it is radical. Donald Trump wants to be free to be critical of Islam. Hillary Clinton wants to impose a gag order on criticism of Islam and even make it a crime.
Donald Trump is a friend of Israel. He wants to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s undivided capital and to move the U.S. Embassy there. He supports settlement construction and is open to alternate solutions to the conflict. Hillary Clinton supports the continuation of President Obama’s policies of freezing settlement construction and imposing the two-state solution on Israel along the 1949 ceasefire lines with a division of Jerusalem.
These are profound differences. Even if Trump’s unwanted sexual advances reached the level of Bill Clinton’s, I would still vote for him. Too much is at stake. The future of America is on the line.
On the other hand, for the sake of argument, let us assume that their platforms are identical. One is left to decide whom to vote for based only on their track records and character traits.
Donald Trump is a sexual predator who stops short of rape or using force. He is a tough businessman in a tough business. He has built a very successful real estate company. He is a fighter and a winner.
Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and fraud artist. The facts are such as to lead many to believe that if tried in a court of law, she would be convicted of many serious crimes. These include lying to Congress, destroying evidence after receiving a subpoena, selling access to the State Department and government for cash, treason, and many more.
I’d add another reason, not that another is needed. Trump may not even be guilty of the claims made against him, in fact there are good reasons to be skeptical of those claims. The Democrats do this every four years. They did it to Ronald Reagan, George Herbert Walker Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney.
Remember how Harry Reid claimed that Mitt Romney hadn’t paid any taxes for ten years? After the election Reid admitted that he made the whole thing up, saying “Well, he didn’t win did he? We won.” As if that justified the lie.
Everything they said about those men was either completely false or exaggerated beyond all reason. Why should we believe any of this quadrennial trash from the Democrat cesspits of the national media?
For a very interesting side story on how the likes of Harry Reid and the Democrat party justify their degenerate and corrupt behavior, check this out: The MacGuffinization of American Politics.