Uranium One Scandal Growing Legs

Before you read the rest of this post on the Clinton/Obama/FBI farce investigations of Donald Trump, you might want to check out: 7 Uranium One Facts Every American Should Know for background. Getting those facts into your mind will do what lawyers call “Laying a foundation” to make what comes next more relevant and easier to follow.

Woven into those 7 facts is one that could be stated as the 8th fact because of it’s origin. The Uranium One Scandal has been well reported by The New York Times, The Daily Caller, and The Hill. Neither the NYT nor The Hill are known to be conservative or Republican. The very leftist New York Daily News buried this tidbit deep into a related story:

Records at opensecrets.org show that the lobbying group also received $90,000 from Uranium One, a company that controls U.S. uranium interests. The company’s sale to Russia has drawn scrutiny because of Russian interests donating to the Clinton Foundation.

More from The Hill: FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow

This is an excerpt from Victor Davis Hanson’s great piece, Investigating the Investigators

Are we finally nearing the end of our own Jacobin cycle of revolutionary fervor—as wild charges of criminality are exposed to be little more than the bitter feelings over a blown election or, worse, efforts either to nullify that election or an attempt to cloak the accusers’ own felonious behavior? But the inquisitions will likely stop only when the inquisitors, under intense pressures, learn that they have far more exposure to the very charges that they have leveled—and thus finally beg to call the whole sordid matter off.

Diminished Institutions, Stark Truths
In a fair world, Robert Mueller would find that his original agenda had proved irrelevant, other than incidentally colliding with far more serious culpability on the part of many of those who had energized him. He would then either drop the investigation, recuse himself, or expand it to include far more likely charges of collusion that affected our national security.

In a fair world, those in the House Ethics Committee long ago would have dropped politically motivated and empty complaints against Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and would have agreed that he was simply a political target. He was preemptively targeted not for leaking classified government information (which he did not do), but for presciently long ago announcing to intelligence agencies and to the president that Obama Administration officials had likely improperly unmasked information about private U.S. citizens that was subsequently unlawfully leaked to the press—a tawdry process that ultimately may well be connected to many of the scandals mentioned above.

And in a fair world, those who were determined to indict all who profited from Russian largesse would conclude that the Clinton machine always should have been their most likely target.

America is in a radical state of flux, or rather in a great accounting and recalibration, ranging from government to popular culture.

Hollywood lived a lie and now is not what it was just three weeks ago. The NFL was based on known but ignored hypocrisies and is no longer the league it was in September. The media has put rank partisanship before truth and lost ideologically and morally.

And the lie about Russian collusion has sired truths beyond our wildest nightmares.

VDH is the one of the best politics and history commentators in America, so you will of course want to read the whole thing.

See also, Team Obama’s Stunning Cover-up of Russian Crimes.

It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.

Peter Schweizer got onto part of the scandal in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash”: the gifts of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the $500,000 fee to Bill for a single speech, by individuals involved in a deal that required Hillary Clinton’s approval.

The New York Times confirmed and followed up on Schweizer’s reporting — all of it denounced by Hillary as a partisan hit job.

But now The Hill reports that the FBI in 2009 had collected substantial evidence — eyewitnesses backed by documents — of money-laundering, blackmail and bribery by Russian nuclear officials, all aimed at growing “Vladimir Putin’s atomic-energy business inside the United States” in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The bureau even flagged the routing of millions from Russian nuclear officials to cutouts and on to Clinton Inc.

This is going to grow like fungus on the Clintons, Obama, the FBI and possibly Robert Mueller and James Comey.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Archives

%d bloggers like this: