<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TeeJaw BlogTeeJaw Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teejaw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teejaw.com</link>
	<description>Truth, Justice and The American Way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Colorado’s Prop 103, A Proposal to Raise Income and Sales Taxes, Failed Miserably Last Tuesday by TeeJaw</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2011/11/06/why-colorados-prop-103-a-proposal-to-raise-income-and-sales-taxes-failed-miserably-last-tuesday/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>TeeJaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=9415#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Thanks for your comment, and for reading the post.  If you’re in sympathy with the views expressed, and apparently you are, thanks for that too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, and for reading the post.  If you’re in sympathy with the views expressed, and apparently you are, thanks for that too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Colorado’s Prop 103, A Proposal to Raise Income and Sales Taxes, Failed Miserably Last Tuesday by Michael</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2011/11/06/why-colorados-prop-103-a-proposal-to-raise-income-and-sales-taxes-failed-miserably-last-tuesday/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=9415#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Thank you for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Thank you for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romney Gives Ample Demonstration Today Why He Is the Wrong Horse for Republicans to Run Against Obama by TeeJaw</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2012/02/01/romney-gives-ample-demonstration-just-why-he-is-the-wrong-horse-for-republicans-to-run-against-obama/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>TeeJaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=10784#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Maybe they don’t understand how starting a business qualifies one to be president of the United States. Plenty of liberals are successful in business. They’re still liberals and to the conservative way of thinking they would be terrible presidents. Conservatives are the majority of the Republican party, so it should not be surprising that they want a principled conservative to be the Republican nominee. Romney is not a conservative. He’s a dissembler and a phony. If he gets the nomination conservatives will vote for him to stop Obama. But it will make them sick to have to do it.

You might also re-read what I said above about Romney as “a successful business man.”  Maybe the anti-Romney crowd don’t want a president with such a woeful understanding of economic principles.  

Romney compounded the problem today by saying he also supports automatic increases in the minimum wage showing that he also doesn’t understand the harm that the minimum wage does to unskilled workers with no previous work experience.  How many others basic concepts is this man confused about?  He just keeps reaffirming people’s belief that his is not a conservative and doesn’t understand the first thing about conservative philosophy.  Yet he wants us to believe he is a conservative.  Conservatives don’t believe that and they don’t rust him.

“Businessman&quot; is not a qualification for president that has a good track recored.  Jimmy Carter and Herbert Hoover were the only two successful businessmen Presidents in the 20th century and they were both awful presidents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they don’t understand how starting a business qualifies one to be president of the United States. Plenty of liberals are successful in business. They’re still liberals and to the conservative way of thinking they would be terrible presidents. Conservatives are the majority of the Republican party, so it should not be surprising that they want a principled conservative to be the Republican nominee. Romney is not a conservative. He’s a dissembler and a phony. If he gets the nomination conservatives will vote for him to stop Obama. But it will make them sick to have to do it.</p>
<p>You might also re-read what I said above about Romney as “a successful business man.”  Maybe the anti-Romney crowd don’t want a president with such a woeful understanding of economic principles.  </p>
<p>Romney compounded the problem today by saying he also supports automatic increases in the minimum wage showing that he also doesn’t understand the harm that the minimum wage does to unskilled workers with no previous work experience.  How many others basic concepts is this man confused about?  He just keeps reaffirming people’s belief that his is not a conservative and doesn’t understand the first thing about conservative philosophy.  Yet he wants us to believe he is a conservative.  Conservatives don’t believe that and they don’t rust him.</p>
<p>“Businessman&#8221; is not a qualification for president that has a good track recored.  Jimmy Carter and Herbert Hoover were the only two successful businessmen Presidents in the 20th century and they were both awful presidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romney Gives Ample Demonstration Today Why He Is the Wrong Horse for Republicans to Run Against Obama by TeeJaw</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2012/02/01/romney-gives-ample-demonstration-just-why-he-is-the-wrong-horse-for-republicans-to-run-against-obama/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>TeeJaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=10784#comment-999</guid>
		<description>This comment was moved to this post from a different page.

Jim DeLong writes:

Given the choices at hand I wonder why it is that so many oppose someone who: started a business which developed into one of the best in the country, has been happily married to the same women for a number of years, took on a fiasco in Salt Lake and successfully saved the olympics, believes in god and contributes genrously, is bright, and has been a govenor and managed one of the more populated states in the country.  Some go so far as saying let President Obama win and appoint judges as he sees fit since we will never loose the house and will win the Senate anyway??? Any way it&#039;s not important that President Obama was a lack-luster state legislator with his most significant vote being &quot;present&quot;, was a &quot;genuine&quot; neighborhood organizer, had a number of dubious associations,  served in the United States Senate but was running for president for four of the six years, as senator was upset about the level of national debt and therefore voted against raising it, and finally to the best of my knowledge accomplished only one thing of note that helped the country: he successfully introduced zero legislation that passed!  Come on Republicans lets convene our circular firing squad and begin the beguine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment was moved to this post from a different page.</p>
<p>Jim DeLong writes:</p>
<p>Given the choices at hand I wonder why it is that so many oppose someone who: started a business which developed into one of the best in the country, has been happily married to the same women for a number of years, took on a fiasco in Salt Lake and successfully saved the olympics, believes in god and contributes genrously, is bright, and has been a govenor and managed one of the more populated states in the country.  Some go so far as saying let President Obama win and appoint judges as he sees fit since we will never loose the house and will win the Senate anyway??? Any way it&#8217;s not important that President Obama was a lack-luster state legislator with his most significant vote being &#8220;present&#8221;, was a &#8220;genuine&#8221; neighborhood organizer, had a number of dubious associations,  served in the United States Senate but was running for president for four of the six years, as senator was upset about the level of national debt and therefore voted against raising it, and finally to the best of my knowledge accomplished only one thing of note that helped the country: he successfully introduced zero legislation that passed!  Come on Republicans lets convene our circular firing squad and begin the beguine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Loser Revenge&#8221; Laws Being Pushed Back In New Mexico by lg tv 47lv4400</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2010/02/24/loser-revenge-laws-being-pushed-back-in-new-mexico/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>lg tv 47lv4400</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=2852#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Hands down, Apple&#039;s app store wins by a mile. It&#039;s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hands down, Apple&#8217;s app store wins by a mile. It&#8217;s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Cop, Bad Cop by Waituemia</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2011/11/01/good-cop-bad-cop/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Waituemia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=9351#comment-964</guid>
		<description>I just added this web site to my google reader, great stuff. Can not get enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just added this web site to my google reader, great stuff. Can not get enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Advice On The Proper Shooting Stance by Waituemia</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2011/04/01/good-advice-on-the-proper-shooting-stance/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Waituemia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=7354#comment-960</guid>
		<description>Good posting, im subscribing to your rss. Many thanks once more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good posting, im subscribing to your rss. Many thanks once more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keep Kids Safe On Halloween&#8230;From Democrats by Waituemia</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2011/10/31/keep-kids-safe-on-halloween-from-democrats/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Waituemia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=5969#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Where by May I Discover The same Advice In relation to this subject matter? ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where by May I Discover The same Advice In relation to this subject matter? ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prosecutorial Injustice in the Criminal Justice System by Waituemia</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2010/09/28/prosecutorial-injustice-in-the-criminal-justice-system/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Waituemia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=5713#comment-934</guid>
		<description>I?m a blog crazed person and i love to read cool blog like yours</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I?m a blog crazed person and i love to read cool blog like yours</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Remembering The Dust Bowl by Shelley</title>
		<link>http://teejaw.com/2011/07/30/remembering-the-dust-bowl/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teejaw.com/?p=8376#comment-925</guid>
		<description>That striking photograph says it all.

My page is about the human cost behind it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That striking photograph says it all.</p>
<p>My page is about the human cost behind it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

